[collectd] Configure reporting interval on network plugin

[Joel Serrano]

One last thing, the parameters would be these:

WriteQueueLimitHigh HighNum
WriteQueueLimitLow LowNum

Correct??

Thanks,
Joel.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Joel Serrano <joel at gogii.net> wrote:

> So, an update here:
>
> Gathering CPU + 3 SNMP OIDs:
>
> 23:20:30.342653 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308
> 23:21:20.341185 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308
> 23:22:10.341337 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308
> 23:23:00.341386 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308
>
> (50s approx)
>
> Now, I added the memory. (CPU + 3 SNMP OIDs + MEMORY)
>
> New results:
>
> 23:24:11.226821 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1309
> 23:24:31.288530 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1293
> 23:25:01.273344 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1318
> 23:25:31.257782 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1300
>
> (30s approx)
>
> Now, I added interface and disk. (CPU + 3 SNMP OIDs + MEMORY + DISK +
> INTERFACE)
>
> 23:26:31.466675 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1328
> 23:26:41.465791 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1301
> 23:26:51.465875 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1306
> 23:27:01.511527 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1292
>
> (10s approx)
>
> This obviously means the more data, the faster you fill the buffer, the
> more often you send the metrics.
>
> All these tests are with the default value for queues/buffers/limits.
>
> I am going to play with those values now and compare the results to these.
>
>
> I'll update again later.
>
> Joel.
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Giovanni Torres <
> giovanni.torres at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:22 PM Joel Serrano <joel at gogii.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Well I really think it could be what Marc said.
>>>
>>> On v5.5 until the buffer is full it won't wend anything (anywhere...).
>>>
>>> I'm going to lower the buffer and see if the reporting time decreases,
>>> if Marc is right, it should work.
>>>
>>> I'll post back the results.
>>>
>>
>> I'm curious to hear your results.  How much did you lower the buffer size
>> to vs how many metrics are you handing?
>>
>> Giovanni
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/attachments/20160216/33499528/attachment.html>