[collectd] ntohll and htonll patch for OpenSolaris

[Amit Gupta]

Hi Florian,

Manuel Sanmartin 's patch is similar to mine and it will work for me too :).
This patch is just checking for htonll function and assume the other
function ntohll exists (which probably is true). I was checking for both
htonll and ntohll and had two separate defines.

Regards
Amit
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Florian Forster <octo at verplant.org> wrote:

> Hi Amit,
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:42:36AM +0530, Amit Gupta wrote:
> > On 2/18/10, Amit Gupta <amit.gupta221 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hopefully this is the last patch for the collectd integration into
> > > OpenSolaris :). This patch is about avoiding the redeclaration of
> > > ntohll and htonll functions if the underlying platform provide these
> > > functions (OpenSolaris has ntohll and htonll macros/functions
> > > defined in the /usr/include/sys/byteorder.h).
>
> unfortunately I can't find the email you're quoting here. I even did a
> full-text search for "Hopefully" with a capital "H" but nothing turned
> up. A Google search found [0] as the only result.
>
> I've just applied a patch by Manuel Sanmartin which solves the same
> issue under AIX. It'd be great if you could let me know if that works
> for Solaris as well or if modifications are needed.
>
> Regards,
> —octo
>
> [0] <http://www.mail-archive.com/collectd@verplant.org/msg00419.html>
> --
> Florian octo Forster
> Hacker in training
> GnuPG: 0x91523C3D
> http://verplant.org/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFLlnrdHdggu3Q05IYRAi3IAJ90i8/qgJCmlXC+HVUhJ6uZSUMwrwCgkdiX
> AsQq6MuDosHsEicq3wcErFo=
> =8SLU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/attachments/20100312/18b503e6/attachment.htm