[collectd] NTPd-plugin et alii: Future improvements

[Florian Forster]

Hi Lubos,

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:14:59PM +0100, Lubo?? Stan??k wrote:
> BTW I do not like to see the ntpd plugin collecting stats for the
> ntpd's local time broadcast. You mentioned at several places that your
> time resources are short. Should I implement the ServerPeer and
> IgnoreSelected for the ntpd plugin?

sure, if you want to have that, I don't see a reason why I shouldn't
accept such a patch ;) However, I think that many plugins would profit
from such a mechanismn, so it'd be very handy to have some generic code
for that. That code could, for example, reside in `utils_ignore.[ch]'
and provide an abstract interface, such as `ignore_{create,add,match}'.

Regards,
-octo
-- 
Florian octo Forster
Hacker in training
GnuPG: 0x91523C3D
http://verplant.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/attachments/20061105/0b11ae85/attachment.pgp