[collectd] users plugin

[Sebastian Harl]

> i remember some older versions of solaris (sol8?) had problems
> with [uw]tmp{x}?.

Do you remember what kinds of problems occured?

> there is getutxent and getutent (at least on solaris9). so you might
> check the function in configure.in as well...

Well, Florian already added a check for utmpx.h and getutxent to configure.in.
I'm going to add a check for the non-"x"-versions as well, but will prefer the 
"x"-versions if both are available. Do you know of any system that only has
the non-"x"-versions? In any other case this check should not be necessary.

Cheers,
-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/attachments/20051205/165378e0/attachment.pgp