[collectd] fscache Patch

[Sebastian Harl]

Hi,

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 07:03:27PM +0200, Florian Forster wrote:
> I don't know if this is desirable or not, but those value-names (such
> as `n' or `ok' or `wt') seem awfully short and hard to understand. Would
> it make sense to translate those to something more meaningful? The
> downside I'm currently seeing is that then those names wouldn't
> correspond to the Kernel docs anymore..

Also, it would require modifications any time new value-names are added,
basically making the plugin not "forward-compatible". So, I don't think
that this would be a good idea. Some frontend could still do that kind
of work, which imho is the right place for it.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/attachments/20090503/21ed7d8a/attachment.pgp