[collectd] Compilation errors
octo at verplant.org
Fri Oct 26 14:03:48 CEST 2007
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 12:13:01PM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Florian, I think, we should remove all the HAVE_FOO_H checks from
> plugins that require specific headers. This should provide more
> reasonable error messages to the users when a build fails.
I started doing this a while back but didn't actively remove these
if-defs from existing plugins.. I might be doing this peu-a-peu though.
> This is a common error on a lot of (mostly 64bit) architectures. You need a
> version of the library (libnetlink in this case) which has been compiled with
> -fPIC. See Debian bugs #358637 (), #419684 () and #430933 () for more
> details about this issue.
> Florian, I think this should be added to the FAQ as it appears quite
> frequently. I will write an answer for it later and ping you on IRC.
Sounds like a good idea.. I'll write an entry about the `--enable-foo'
stuff, too, since apparently this causes some confusion, too..
Florian octo Forster
Hacker in training
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.verplant.org/pipermail/collectd/attachments/20071026/0093fdf5/attachment.pgp
More information about the collectd