[collectd] Compile problem on Fedora Core 5 64bit
bart at istnet.net.au
Sun Apr 30 16:25:41 CEST 2006
Is this what you want?
If I configure with ./configure --disable-apache it all compiles OK.
am__apache_la_SOURCES_DIST = apache.c
am_apache_la_OBJECTS = apache.lo
apache_la_OBJECTS = $(am_apache_la_OBJECTS)
am_apache_la_rpath = -rpath $(pkglibdir)
apache_la_SOURCES = apache.c
apache_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version \
> Hello Daniel,
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:30:07AM +0800, Daniel wrote:
>> gcc -shared .libs/apache.o -L/usr/kerberos/lib64 -lcurl -ldl
>> -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lkrb5support -lcom_err -lresolv
>> /usr/lib/libidn.so -lssl -lcrypto -lz -Wl,-soname -Wl,apache.so -o
>> gcc: /usr/lib/libidn.so: No such file or directory
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:00:02PM +0800, Daniel wrote:
>> [root at bajor src]# curl-config --libs
>> -L/usr/kerberos/lib64 -lcurl -ldl -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto
>> -lkrb5support -lcom_err -lresolv -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -lz
> the output of `curl-config' and the line in the Makefile look okay, i.e.
> as expected. Still, the `/usr/lib/libidn.so' argument is wrong. I'd
> expect `libtool' to do some funky stuff.. Could you paste some lines of
> context, at best everything concerning the apache-plugins (that should
> only be about 3-5 lines)..
>> So it all looks OK? What do you think?
> Yes, as it seams the `configure' Script works as expected.. I've had
> problems with libtool and Solaris before, so I wouldn't be surprised if
> the problem was in there somewhere..
More information about the collectd